data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26c2f/26c2fdc588a11a8b121fe7a3c308e9fe2b4194ea" alt="How to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95a6b/95a6b59f31b690a933f5e7befc5c82f7f0edfcc3" alt="how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl"
A) is simply not going to happen on any system running a Free OS to begin with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df36a/df36a670190de73241ad43c81be026c13f874c8b" alt="how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl"
The bugaboos of A) users being somehow forced by a manufacturer to upgrade the firmware or B) that they might somehow download a backdoored firmware later have not come to pass.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/112a1/112a1445fd852bb38cc1707697b2d7ba907093ac" alt="how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl how to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl"
It only means that bugs cannot be patched and Free replacements cannot be developed and distributed. The fact that firmware is unchangeable is not a benefit to the user. Then it's "just hardware." Even better if it's a ROM because then it's especially "just hardware." There's a *strong* contingent in Free Software would prefer it one way vs the other: that uploading firmware onto a device is bad, but it's OK if the devices is running the firmware off of internal storage. They just stopped shipping the firmware on-device, meaning it now needs to be uploaded. A point brought up that I don't think is often properly addressed: A lot of devices have had onboard firmware longer than drivers have been uploading firmware onto them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26c2f/26c2fdc588a11a8b121fe7a3c308e9fe2b4194ea" alt="How to make a usb 2.0 to ethernet adapter vhdl"